|
Energy, Environment and Resources CenterThe University of TennesseeHighlights and Initiatives |
|---|---|
|
January 2004 - Energy, Environment and Resources Center Jack Barkenbus, Executive Director Center For Clean Products and Clean Technologies Gary A. Davis, Director Office of Communications and Publications David Brill, Director Center for Geography and Environmental Education Rosalyn McKeown-Ice, Director Oak Ridge Technology Research and Development Program Sheila Webster, Director Systems Development Institute Donald Alvic, Director Pro-Dialogue Mary R. English and David L. Feldman, Directors Water Resources Research Center Tim Gangaware, Associate Director _______________ Highlights and Initiatives is written and edited by Constance Griffith <cbgriffith@utk.edu>. For more information call Gail Farris at 865-974-4251 or write to EERC, 311 Conference Center Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-4134. Visit our Web site at: http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/ |
APPOINTMENT.
Outgoing Knoxville Mayor Victor Ashe recently appointed PROJECTS. Kimberly Davis and Susan Pfiffner (Research Assistant Professor with UT’s Center for Environmental Biotechnology and Center for Biomarker Analysis) form part of a team of 18 scientists from the University of Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and five other research institutions, who compose the Indiana-Princeton-Tennessee Astrobiology Initiative (IPTAI). The scientists are examining deep underground environments that support living microbe communities. IPTAI is one of 16 teams that make up the NASA-funded Astrobiology Institute, an international research consortium. IPTAI will design instruments, data-logging systems, and algorithms for differentiating nonbiotic and biotic biogeochemical cycles on Earth and, potentially, on Mars. Davis and Pfiffner, who will coordinate education and public outreach for IPTAI’s scientific research, are currently working on a related NSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates program, in which U.S. minority students team with South African students to examine extreme bacteria in South Africa’s gold mines. WMREI recently awarded a grant to Research Ecologist Jack
Ranney, who is leading a project to establish Knoxville as a
prototype for community-based invasive-species control. Pest plants are
infiltrating Knoxville’s greenways, damaging the natural environment,
threatening human safety, thwarting maintenance efforts, and diminishing Collaborative research produces a comprehensive assessment that gives
manufacturers a clear view of safer, viable alternatives to conventional
adhesives.
THOUSANDS OF U.S. FOAM fabricators and bedding and upholstered-furniture manufacturers use polyurethane foam in their products, but increasingly strict regulations and human-health and environmental risks associated with the use of traditional adhesives have forced these industry sectors to evaluate safer alternatives. To help guide the evaluation process, EERC’s Center for Clean Products and Clean technologies (CCPCT) has teamed with the Institute for Research and Technical Assistance (IRTA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conduct a cleaner technologies substitutes assessment (CTSA) of alternative foam adhesives. The CTSA provides upholstered furniture and bedding manufacturers with comparative information on readily available adhesive alternatives. The alternatives include one-part and two-part water-based adhesives, hot-melt adhesives, and adhesives based on the solvents acetone and n-propyl bromide. The report evaluates the alternatives in terms of performance, cost, and human and environmental health impacts. “Our evaluation shows the importance of replacing solvent-based spray adhesives with safer alternatives,” says Mary B. Swanson, CCPCT research scientist. These manufacturers have traditionally used 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) as their adhesive of choice, but production of TCA, an ozone-depleting substance, was banned in 1996. Most manufacturers responded to the ban by shifting to methylene chloride (METH), a suspected carcinogen. Then, in January 1997, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) introduced stringent regulations governing the use of METH, forcing many manufacturers to seek alternatives. The CTSA’s performance component was based on visits to 32 foam fabricators and bedding and upholstered-furniture manufacturers in the United States. For the most part, the alternatives performed as well or better than TCA or METH adhesives. From a human-health and environmental standpoint, hot-melt adhesives appear to pose the fewest risks, but they cannot be used in all applications. Water-based adhesives pose much lower risk than solvent-based adhesives, but their use may not be suitable for all applications. “This research demonstrates that alternative adhesives that are
better for human health and the environment are widely available,”
says Katy Wolf, IRTA executive director. “Companies seeking alternatives
should focus on the nonsolvent based adhesives.”
For more information, visit the UT YEAH Web site at <http://utyeah.utk.edu>. To read the full text of this article, access InSites volume 11, number 1 at <http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/insites/>. |
| The EERC conducts analytical, unbiased, and multidisciplinary research designed to promote real-world solutions to problems in the fields of energy, environment, technology, and economic development. | |
Go back to Highlights index.
Go back to EERC publications.
Go back to EERC Home.